Estimated reading time: 3 minutes
The Second Amendment Foundation is expanding a lawsuit against New Jersey officials after discovering what it says is a disturbing pattern: law-abiding residents allegedly losing gun rights not because of anything they did, but because of who they lived with.
That’s the central claim in Aliaj v. Fort Lee Police Department, a federal lawsuit that now includes multiple plaintiffs who say Bergen County officials revoked permits, denied applications, and confiscated firearms based solely on concerns about other people living in their homes.

And if SAF’s allegations are accurate, the implications are pretty staggering.
The case originally began with plaintiff Elsid Aliaj, whose firearms were allegedly confiscated by authorities. SAF has now amended the lawsuit to add plaintiffs Martin Hroncich and Luis Rene De La Cruz Franco, both of whom reportedly experienced similar permit denials, revocations, or firearm confiscations.
According to the amended complaint, none of the plaintiffs were prohibited from possessing firearms themselves.
Instead, SAF says county officials targeted them because they shared residences with individuals authorities either believed were prohibited persons or suspected might be prohibited from firearm ownership.
SEE ALSO: Geissele King Hunter Review: 7mm Heat, Half-MOA Bite
Think about that for a second. Imagine losing your driver’s license because your roommate got too many speeding tickets. Or having your hunting license revoked because your cousin broke a game law.
That’s essentially the constitutional question at the center of this case.
SAF Senior Director of Legal Operations Bill Sack argues Bergen County has effectively adopted a policy of guilt by association.
“What we learned after filing this case on behalf of Mr. Aliaj is that the constitutional abuse he suffered was all too common in Bergen County,” Sack said.
According to SAF, additional residents began contacting the organization after the original lawsuit was filed, describing nearly identical experiences involving permit denials and firearm seizures tied to concerns about family members or cohabitants.
The amended complaint alleges county officials have maintained policies that deprive individuals of their Second Amendment rights based not on their own conduct, but on their relationship with someone else.
SAF founder Alan Gottlieb says the expanded lawsuit demonstrates a broader pattern of constitutional violations.
SEE ALSO: SIG P365 Family: Still the Benchmark for Everyday Carry
This confirms what we hear from SAF members in gun-grabbing states like New Jersey all the time,” Gottlieb said. “Local officials do what they want, when they want, without any respect for the law or the Constitution.”
The case now heads forward with multiple plaintiffs and a much broader challenge to Bergen County’s alleged practices.
And if the allegations prove true, the courts may soon have to answer a simple question:
Can the government take away your constitutional rights because of someone else’s conduct?
That’s a question likely to get plenty of attention far beyond New Jersey.
*** Buy and Sell on GunsAmerica! ***

That’s life in Nazi Jersey.
Well first off… “… they shared residences with individuals authorities either believed were prohibited persons or suspected might be prohibited from firearm ownership.”
That’s just illegal anyway. Laws aren’t about thinking, they’re about knowing. I don’t care what you people “believe” were prohibited… If they don’t have a criminal background that prevents them from owning a gun, you can’t say they do. The proof is in the pudding. That’s just a stupid situation that wastes time and money in the courts.
Life isn’t difficult, humans make it difficult!
Hard to be sympathetic for the people who vote for the politicians enacting these laws. Stop voting for democrats.
sounds more like an underhanded backdoor confiscation scheme, i’m sure as people try and renew they will be hit also.