NSSF Exposes Joyce Foundation’s Gun-Control Funding

in News

Estimated reading time: 4 minutes

The gun-control movement often presents itself as a grassroots uprising demanding more firearm restrictions.

NSSF says the money trail tells a very different story.

The firearm industry trade association has released the latest installment of its Gun Rights Insights campaign. This time, the spotlight is on the Joyce Foundation, a Chicago-based private foundation with deep pockets and decades of involvement in gun-control research and advocacy.

The goal of Gun Rights Insights is pretty simple. NSSF wants gun owners to see who funds the organizations, studies and campaigns pushing new firearm restrictions.

According to NSSF Senior Vice President and General Counsel Larry Keane, the larger gun-control movement receives as much as $400 million each year from wealthy donors and progressive foundations.

NSSF argues that this funding creates the appearance of a broad public movement when much of the work comes from a relatively small group of well-funded organizations.

Who Is the Joyce Foundation?

The Joyce Foundation traces its roots to 1948. Beatrice Joyce Kean, the daughter of an Iowa lumber executive, later left most of her estate to the organization.

Today, the foundation describes itself as a “private, nonpartisan philanthropy” focused on racial equity and economic mobility in the Great Lakes region.

Gun policy is also a major part of its work.

The Joyce Foundation openly lists “Gun Violence Prevention & Justice Reform” among its primary funding areas. It supports research, advocacy organizations and government programs built around firearm restrictions and violence-prevention policies.

The foundation reported $1.3 billion in assets in 2024. That year, it made $63.5 million in qualifying charitable distributions across its different programs.

NSSF says Joyce has poured nearly $100 million into gun-control efforts over the years.

Obama and the Joyce Foundation

Former President Barack Obama served on the Joyce Foundation’s board from 1994 until 2002, before his rise in national politics.

Obama later supported a renewed ban on commonly owned semiautomatic rifles and nationwide background checks for private firearm transfers.

Other people connected to his administration have also held positions with the foundation.

Current Joyce Foundation Board Chair Margot Rogers previously served as chief of staff to former Education Secretary Arne Duncan. Vice Chair Tracey Meares served on Obama’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing.

Board member Cecilia Muñoz spent eight years in the Obama administration, including five years leading the White House Domestic Policy Council. Former Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett previously served on the foundation’s board as well.

Those connections do not prove that the foundation takes orders from Obama or his former administration. However, they show how closely its leadership has overlapped with major Democratic policy circles.

Where Does the Money Go?

NSSF’s biggest concern is not simply that Joyce supports gun control. The foundation says that openly.

The larger concern is how that money can influence research, public policy and media coverage.

According to NSSF’s report, Joyce helped fund organizations including the Violence Policy Center and the Educational Fund to Stop Gun Violence.

The Educational Fund to Stop Gun Violence later merged with the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Its policy work included permit-to-purchase laws, restrictions on public carry and firearm microstamping mandates.

SEE ALSO: ZCO ZC210 Review: The 2-10x Do-It-All Scope

NSSF describes microstamping as a backdoor gun ban because commercially available firearms may not be able to meet the requirement reliably. The National Institute of Standards and Technology recently told Congress that available research does not establish the technology’s reliability for identifying a firearm.

Joyce has also funded New Venture Fund, a nonprofit financial hub supporting numerous progressive organizations and campaigns. Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers sued the group over allegations involving foreign money and state political activity. Those allegations have not been resolved by the information NSSF presented.

Why NSSF Is Calling It Out

Research can shape legislation, court arguments and public opinion. It can also provide talking points that bounce from advocacy groups to politicians and eventually into news coverage.

That is why the people paying for it matter.

NSSF argues that gun owners should know when a study or campaign presented as independent received financial backing from a foundation already committed to expanding firearm restrictions.

That does not automatically make every study false. It does mean readers should examine the funding, methods and conclusions instead of accepting a headline at face value.

NSSF also points to Chicago, the Joyce Foundation’s home city, as a real-world test of the policies the organization supports. Illinois already has some of the country’s strictest firearm laws. Yet Chicago continues to struggle with violent crime.

The Second Amendment community and the Joyce Foundation will obviously disagree over what that proves. Joyce supporters argue that more intervention is needed. NSSF argues that additional restrictions mainly burden citizens who already follow the law.

Either way, the money behind the debate is no small matter.

The Joyce Foundation has the resources to fund research, advocacy and policy work for years. NSSF’s message to gun owners is equally straightforward: follow the money, examine who benefits and do not confuse well-funded activism with a spontaneous grassroots movement.

*** Buy and Sell on GunsAmerica! ***

Available on GunsAmerica Now

https://gunsamerica.com/listings/search

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *