Estimated reading time: 3 minutes
When a senior national security official walks away in the middle of a war, people notice.
That’s exactly what happened this week when Joe Kent stepped down from his role as Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, citing deep concerns over the ongoing war with Iran.
After much reflection, I have decided to resign from my position as Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, effective today.
— Joe Kent (@joekent16jan19) March 17, 2026
I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran. Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this… pic.twitter.com/prtu86DpEr
And his resignation letter? It didn’t pull punches.
“I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran,” Kent wrote. “Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby.”
That’s a direct shot at the core justification behind the conflict and it’s coming from inside the house.
Table of contents
A Break Inside the Administration
Kent’s resignation marks the first major internal break over the Iran conflict, exposing a growing divide within the administration over foreign policy.
On one side: those who believe Iran posed a legitimate and imminent threat.
On the other: a rising faction arguing this is another Middle East entanglement the U.S. should’ve avoided.
Kent clearly falls in the latter camp.
SEE ALSO: Colt’s Blued Python Is Back and It Still Bites
In his letter, he doubled down on an “America First” approach, arguing the U.S. was being pulled into yet another war with questionable justification.
He even went further, claiming the war was driven by outside pressure and misinformation, not a clear and present danger.
That’s a serious accusation and one that immediately drew pushback from the White House, which insists the decision was based on credible intelligence.
Not Just Politics. Personal Stakes
BREAKING: 11 tour SOF Veteran @joekent16jan19 labeled "THE QUITTER" by reservist harrier pilot ltcol @gregkellyusa , a man that couldn't find his flight suit after 9/11 pic.twitter.com/oG9ib7zMel
— Clay Martin ⚔️ (@wayofftheres) March 18, 2026
This isn’t some desk analyst throwing opinions around.
Kent is a combat veteran who deployed multiple times and lost his wife, Shannon, in a terrorist attack overseas. That context matters. And it adds weight to his argument that America should avoid “never-ending wars.”
In his resignation, he praised past decisive military actions (like the strike on Qasem Soleimani and the fight against ISIS) but warned against slipping back into long, drawn-out conflicts.
Translation: use force when necessary. But don’t get stuck in the sandbox.
Trump Fires Back
President Donald Trump didn’t exactly send Kent off with a salute.
Instead, he dismissed the resignation outright, calling Kent “weak on security” and reiterating that Iran was a real and immediate threat.
That response highlights just how wide the gap is right now even among people who were once aligned.
Bigger Than One Resignation
This isn’t just about one official quitting.
It raises bigger questions:
- Was Iran truly an imminent threat?
- Did the U.S. get pulled into another unnecessary conflict?
- And how much internal disagreement is happening behind the scenes?
For a lot of Americans, especially in the 2A and veteran communities, this hits close to home.
Because the same people asked to fight these wars are often the ones questioning them the most.
Your Take
This one’s not black and white and it’s definitely not settled.
So let’s hear it:
What do you think about the war with Iran? Did Kent make the right call by resigning or should he have stayed and fought from the inside?
*** Buy and Sell on GunsAmerica! ***
Available on GunsAmerica Now
is a seasoned outdoorsman, lifelong hunter, and the kind of guy who’d rather track whitetails than scroll social media. As an editor for GunsAmerica, he’s got a sharp eye for spotting both solid gear and bad gun laws. Whether he’s deep in the woods or deep in editorial deadlines, Larry brings a no-nonsense, tell-it-like-it-is approach to firearms, hunting, and the great American tradition of self-reliance. If there’s a hot debate on gun rights or the latest in hunting tech, you can bet Larry’s got an opinion—and it’s probably backed up with both facts and field experience.
Experience:
– Licensed Bowhunter, Hunter, and Trapper – Experienced in ethical hunting and wildlife conservation.
– Concealed Carry Permit Holder (NYS & AZ) – Trained and licensed to carry in multiple states.
– 2A Journalist – Covering firearms legislation, Second Amendment issues, and gun rights for over a decade.
– Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) – Certified to provide emergency medical care in the field.
– Field-Tested Gear Reviewer – Hands-on experience with firearms, optics, and hunting tech.
these are hardcore fanatics that believe they will go to their heaven if they combat and die to fight evil. any non-muslim and some muslims are evil so yes they are a threat to all. lets also address that sleepy joe gave them a nuclear program with his agreements.
Does he have any evidence that Trump is being influenced?