The National Association for Gun Rights (NAGR) is publicly calling for Attorney General Pam Bondi to be fired — and it’s not subtle. In a fiery fundraising email, NAGR wrote:
“Your National Association for Gun Rights is officially calling for Attorney General Pam Bondi to be FIRED.” Fire Pam Bondi
Why so dramatic?
NAGR says Bondi’s Department of Justice convinced a federal judge to order two major gun-rights groups to turn over their membership lists — names, addresses, contact info — to the government.
The group says that demand amounts to a backdoor registry of gun owners and a violation of the First Amendment right to anonymous association. Fire Pam Bondi.
SEE ALSO: S&W 44 Magnum Mountain Gun Returns & It’s Better Than Ever!
NAGR lays out a triple accusation against Bondi’s DOJ, labeled in the email as Exhibit A, B, and C:
- Exhibit A: Bondi’s DOJ “still upholds Biden’s ‘engaged in the business’ ATF gun control rule,” the email claims, arguing the DOJ is enforcing the rule while delaying challenges that could give relief to gun owners. Fire Pam Bondi
- Exhibit B: The DOJ is allegedly pushing to keep lifetime gun bans for nonviolent offenders by asking the Supreme Court not to restore those felons’ rights. Fire Pam Bondi
- Exhibit C: Bondi’s DOJ is said to be actively opposing recent pro-gun rulings that loosen restrictions on 18–20-year-olds buying handguns — and seeking membership lists to limit organizational relief. Fire Pam Bondi
NAGR frames the membership demand as an existential threat. It argues the DOJ is forcing gun owners to choose between their First Amendment right to associate privately and their Second Amendment rights. Fire Pam Bondi
The group is asking members to sign a petition demanding Bondi’s termination and to donate to support the campaign. The email stresses urgency, saying there are only “three more years of a pro-gun administration” and urging readers not to “squander” the window to reclaim rights. Fire Pam Bondi
The email admits Bondi’s DOJ has done some things NAGR sees as positive. Still, NAGR’s bottom line is blunt: “The absolute baseline rule for a pro-gun attorney general should be to FIRST DO NO HARM.” They say Bondi has failed that test and must go
*** Buy and Sell on GunsAmerica! ***
Available on GunsAmerica Now
is a seasoned outdoorsman, lifelong hunter, and the kind of guy who’d rather track whitetails than scroll social media. As an editor for GunsAmerica, he’s got a sharp eye for spotting both solid gear and bad gun laws. Whether he’s deep in the woods or deep in editorial deadlines, Larry brings a no-nonsense, tell-it-like-it-is approach to firearms, hunting, and the great American tradition of self-reliance. If there’s a hot debate on gun rights or the latest in hunting tech, you can bet Larry’s got an opinion—and it’s probably backed up with both facts and field experience.
Experience:
– Licensed Bowhunter, Hunter, and Trapper – Experienced in ethical hunting and wildlife conservation.
– Concealed Carry Permit Holder (NYS & AZ) – Trained and licensed to carry in multiple states.
– 2A Journalist – Covering firearms legislation, Second Amendment issues, and gun rights for over a decade.
– Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) – Certified to provide emergency medical care in the field.
– Field-Tested Gear Reviewer – Hands-on experience with firearms, optics, and hunting tech.
Well, here’s my view on felons getting back the right to own, or even handle firearms.
Here in Georgia you first have to serve all time, including any parole, have paid all fines, including restitution.
You then wait Five (5) years before you can apply for a pardon. You cannot have any marks against your record during this time, including tickets, arrests of any kind, and basically live the life of a saint. Then you apply for the pardon, get three (3) character witnesses, get your interview, and wait while the Board of Pardons and Parole makes their decision.
There is no guarantee you will get the pardon. If you do, you then go into the process of getting the felony conviction expunged from your record.
BUT, removing the firearms restrictions will not be done if a firearm was used during the charge resulting in the felony conviction.
Seems reasonable to me.
Now, eighteen (18) year old young adults purchasing handguns. If they pass the NICS check for a rifle, why couldn’t they pass the same for a handgun?
Are they not eligible for military service? Can they enter into contracts? Can they purchase automobiles, insurance, furniture, get married, and do every other adulting thing you can come up with?
Do you trust them to defend the country? Why not trust them to own firearms?
Bondi has done next to nothing on the 2A issues that President Trump promised during the campaign. She almost let Comey reach the Statute of Limitations on his crimes and then let creampuff crony judges and lawyers handle the case who are his friends!!!! No major political figures who have violated hundreds of laws or some laws hundreds of times(Take your pick) have been indicted, yet there is clear evidence that some committed treason! She needs to be canned before she sinks the President like Bill Barr and Jeff Sessions did. She is a pure Deep States snake pit dweller. Alina Habba or Matt Gaetz must be placed in the AG slot and clean out the Obama/Biden trash holdovers and statrt locking folks up before it is too late.
Pam Bondi is not pro 2A and she never has been. Ever since being appointed by Trump she’s been trying to walk a line between appearing pro-2A while not actually being 2A. Of all the few positive things she’s done because the gun rights groups are called her out for not doing and forcing her to back track on her previous positions.
The whole members list thing was a big mistake and over with but there are multiple cases that are clearly unconstitutional that Pam Bondi refuses to back track on. There are still multiple innocent people in federal prison because Pam Bondi refuses to even reconsider the Biden era convictions they received.
Okay, I’ll bite – suppose this group gets their way, who are they proposing as her replacement that is ‘pure’ enough according to them for the post? Anyone that is ‘good enough’ for them might very well alienate other pro 2A groups.
They apparently ‘forget’ that she has a tough row to hoe and LOTS of resistance from the entrenched bureaucracy and not nearly enough direct support from folks/groups that are (supposedly) on our side.
How about letting current armed service members 18 and up full access to whatever gun they want? They will have been through firearms training and they might even be required to take extra course for personal ownership. Isn’t that a win-win?
How about letting ALL 18 year olds access to any firearm they want if they have a clean record !
Well it makes total sense. How can you have an authoritative government and have guns available? It will start slowly, but this administration and any replicas that follow will eventually, drastically limit the type and amount of guns anyone can own. They’ll have some lame reason and push the blame on someone, some group or some manufactured event. No one has assault rifles in china or russia.
Bundi has no mind of her own, she’s just taking orders.
Nice democratic talking point!
This is the reason I have not renewed my membership. I do not agree with blanket restoration of 2A rights to felons. Also I question allowing 18yr. olds buying hand guns. This is probably the most pro 2A adminitration in the last 60yrs.
Do not piss off TRUMP!!
Urgent firing of pam bondi needed
She also afraid to go after the heavy hitters, clapper, susan rice, obama, wrey, the low life clintons and many more . All of them are much more criminal than the new your mafia families and nba people.
I believe she worry about her career more than bringing justice to the obama crime syndicate . Simply put, she is afraid of them
Well, I’m WAY past the 18-21 y.o. group, and I think you’re full of shit. I was raised with firearms and shooting independently by the time I was ten. By the time I was 18, I was more mature than most 30 year olds. If you were smart enough to advocate some minimal amount of training and/or required proficiency for young people, that’s something I already support… but if we can allow someone into the armed forces at 18, then they shouldn’t be prevented from purchasing/owning any type of firearm based solely on their age. My guess is that you’ve spent far too much time around urban environments, which already have a plethora of gun restrictions. Most kids brought up in rural America are born and bred to be responsible gun owners.
Just a point of order, 17 year olds are allowed to join the military with their parent’s / guardian’s signature.
Should we attach gun purchasing to a military enlist ment? Meaning, enlist in the military, graduate that branch’s version of boot camp, then receive authorization to purchase a firearm regardless of age? Not trying to start a stink session, just trying to understand your post.
My reply to GM1 was originally posted in the wrong place. Read the exchange below for clarification. I don’t agree with the current legislation which prevents 18 – 20 year olds from purchasing a pistol. We let young people start driving at 15 or 16, and FAR more people are killed by vehicles than firearms.
If you look at her performance in Florida, she was never the BEST pick from a 2A perspective. Conversely… she wasn’t the WORST pick, even among the MAGA ranks, either. IMO, she could be directing the DOJ to take a stronger stance in supporting the 2A, by stopping ATF’s enforcement of the Vegetable Administration’s anti-gun BS.
Anyone who thinks a person under the age of 21 should be allowed to have a pistol, is an idiot. Yep… I said it and as bold as I could. And regarding former felons… You show me a really really low recidivism rate and I’ll agree to that. But until then… No guns to felons.
And just to give some background… The human brain doesn’t mature till approximately 25 years old. That currently means there are young adults walking around for four years with guns and half a brain lol. I was there once, I remember. If you don’t agree with my opinion, I don’t care Because chances are you’re in that 21 to 25 year old age group anyway. It doesn’t matter how mature you think you or your kid is, laws always cover everyone and cannot be made specific. So just because you have a “mature” 22 year-old… Too damn bad!
Looks like they’re posting my reply in the wrong place, so to be sure you receive it, I am pasting it below.
Well, I’m WAY past the 18-21 y.o. group, and I think you’re full of shit. I was raised with firearms and shooting independently by the time I was ten. By the time I was 18, I was more mature than most 30 year olds. If you were smart enough to advocate some minimal amount of training and/or required proficiency for young people, that’s something I already support… but if we can allow someone into the armed forces at 18, then they shouldn’t be prevented from purchasing/owning any type of firearm based solely on their age. My guess is that you’ve spent far too much time around urban environments, which already have a plethora of gun restrictions. Most kids brought up in rural America are born and bred to be responsible gun owners.
Look at you all jumping to conclusions and stuff… How cute is that! I killed my first groundhog from 100 yards with a 22 when I was 10, on our farm, not in an urban environment. And I love when people say by the time I was blah age, I was more mature than most blah year-olds. Everyone thinks they were mature… Maybe you should ask around, others may have a different opinion of your maturity at that age. And just for arguments sake, let’s go ahead and assume you were mature at that age… That was you, not the vast majority of youth in this country. And as stated… You can’t make exceptions to laws, a law is for everyone?
You can believe whatever the hell you want, General (mental) Midget. I already know what I was, and am… and did in fact impress men 3 and 4 times my age with my maturity. Just because you don’t know any mature young men (or women) doesn’t mean they don’t exist.
☝️👍👍, exactly right. +1.
Anyone that feels that ALL people should be lumped into a single category because of age , and that the RIGHTS of 18 year olds should be trampled on because THEY think they should, is a larger IDIOT ! There, i said it too ! And WHO ARE YOU to decide who is , or is not “mature”, or who gets their RIGHTS trampled ?
Old news and proven false. The DOJ did not request the list of members. The judge took that upon himself. The DOJ has reiterated they have no interest in the list and joined SAF in a joint request to amend the ruling. The judge has vacated his own ruling and agreed to a hearing to amend his previous order. NAGR just lost this months donation from me for overreacting with false information. I’ll divide their share with the other groups I support financially. SAF, FPC,GOA and the ASRPA.
Thank God somebody gets it, thank you! I would never give the NAGR a dime of my money.
Okay, so I have posted several times now. Once to offer a different (qualified) view, to which Larry seems to have replied “prove it”.
Unclear if that was directed toward me, but I posted twice more, proving what I said in my original post, and none of them are out of ‘moderation’ after a couple hours.
Prove it, then I’ll listen.
According to Mark Smith (‘Four Boxes Diner’ on youtube), Constitutional attorney and some kind of gun group award winner, Bondi’s DoJ is doing an outstanding job on 2nd Amendment issues, better than anyone in 50+ years. Harmeet Dhillon is outstanding too.
And he backs it up, regularly. I don’t like her style at all, she’s always emotional in her public press conferences, and I would much rather there was a man in the position. But if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Also, while Sundance at Conservative Treehouse (website, a.k.a. The Last Refuge) is no big fan of Bondi, he says a big part of her role is to protect DJT from internal government (Deep State) attack, and she is doing that extremely well.
So between Mark Smith and Sundance, two people who follow the issues and write or make videos about them every single day, we’d have to be crazy to get rid of Bondi.
And about turning the two gun association membership info over to the judge, the way I read it, the JUDGE gave that order, and Bondi’s DoJ fought it, and the Judge backed down and dropped the demand.
So check this stuff out and be sure what’s right, before we light the torches and grab the pitchforks.
Has anyone sat down with Pam B and asked the hard questions? I’d like to delve deeper, but if those are actually the facts, and it’s not being done by a leftover fron the Biden admin, I agree this is very important who is neing terminated,
she needs to at least find out what the people are doing under her, she might not even be aware it is going on.
Another false case against AG Bondi? Larry Z needs to do better research. That’s two(2) in the same digest posting.