Tennessee Democratic Party Official: ‘White Male Gun Nuts’ Are the ‘Biggest Terrorist Organization on the Planet’

I don’t live in Tennessee, but I sent money to Marsha Blackburn’s campaign. And she BEAT this lying liberal Democrat! YEAH!!

Don’t live in Missouri either, but sent money to Josh Hawley’s Senate campaign, and he BEAT Missouri’s lying liberal Dem senator!! DOUBLE YEAH!!!

I encourage everyone to do the same, support conservative 2nd Amendment-respecting candidates even if not in your own state.

Somewhere well above 70 MILLION gun owners in the US. Responsible and mature folks (with a few idiots thrown in). We the American gun owners are not all white people either—see comment by Sly below—patriotism is NOT limited by skin color.

Yes, if WE were the problem, it would have been totally obvious 100 years ago. But the left wants to hold us responsible for the actions of a tiny number of insane persons. (Actually some of the insane murderers in our recent past have been proven to be liberals too!)

Maybe we should say Diane Feinstein and Mazie Hirono and Maxine Waters are whores, because they have the same physical organs as other women who practice prostitution.

I’d just like to point out to Mr. Brown that if what he said was true and that we white American male gun owners were all terrorists, he would have been dead a long time ago, along with most of the constitution hating democrats.
That inconvenient fact is ignored completely by the liberal press because as my younger sister once said about my favorite news network, all of her favorite news networks are a bunch of liars, while mine (fox) usually tells mostly the truth.
I find it disgusting that anyone in government would be so hateful of American patriots and so disdainful of the constitution that certifies their right to say these lies.
It’s just a pipe dream to think that we might actually have honest press and honorable representatives in government.

Once again the division and ignorance is rampant. Please READ instead of REACTING. This bullshit is ALL just to divide us. Bredesen didnt say shit about us “white gun nuts”. It was a DEM party communications director. Best I recall Phil did a decent job as Governor. Here in east TN all we hear from Marsha are attack ads. Shes complicit in perpetuating the opiate problem.
No one will argue that point. So it’s to crap like THIS. BOTH sides are Bullshit. Please wake up people. We are ALL IN THIS TOGETHER. The ones that deserve our ire are the ones CONSTANTLY dividing us. Including the click bait media cretins. Gun control just like abortion rights are a divisive red herring. THEY(political elites on both sides) are trying to keep us fighting while they gut this fatted calf. NO ONE will succeed if they come after our guns. And I’m NOT saying they wont TRY.
Flame on all you want. This country is in the shitter and our “elected” officials are spreading their cheeks as we speak. I’m sorry if its graphic. But it’s TRUE and just like yall, I’m pissed. Nothing wrong with that, but in begging, get pissed at the right people

This man has always been garbage. He was a terrible Governor and would be a terrible Senator, voted against this low life today. Here’s hoping the scum loses

The Democrat party , the party of no marols and mentally ill angry nut bags. Get out and vote to keep these kooks out of power.

Sounds like typical Democratic BS. The dummy Dems remind me of two other people groups who lie to achieve their goals Homosexuals and Islamics and have temper tantrums when disagreed with.

And ANOTHER Accidently Stepped in Pile of DogSHIT that NEEDS to be SCRAPED OFF THE SHOES OF HUMANITY! Go CRAWL BACK UNDER YOUR ROCK SCUMBAG!

Everyone who owns a gun is a terrorist to the Democrats because a gun is the fine line between being owned by someone or being self protected. We have fought several wars to let the liberal thinking non tax paying people into this country. Now the Democrats want to use their votes against our freedoms. The Democratic party followers are people who need someone else to think for them. The ones that you see on TV are educated way above their intelligence. Look around folks the old Democratic party is not what it used to be.
Another thing! people who live along the East Coast and West coast, want the caravan of illegals to come in, the people on the south border do not. The east and west coast are protected by the Atlantic and pacific oceans. The south border the Rio Grande River.

Democrats are anti-Constitution, self-serving zealots who have a proven reputation for screwing the American people.

Typical identity politics. The silent majority of conservatives better get off their duffs and go vote.

Firearms Control = People Control = Mass Extermination… as History has proven.

The people we elect or hire for public service should be screened for latent or overt gun hatred, and disqualified if such hatred is found, before it can do any more harm to our nation and its values.

Firearms save lives. firearms stop crime. Firearms are why America is still free. The history of freedom is inextricably tied to the development of weapons (an interesting study, by the way, if you have the time to examine it). Good people need firearms. Efforts to end that are immoral and unjust, and when done by government, is a direct failure to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution.” That’s a violation of the oath of office, which should lead to removal from office and possibly even criminal charges.

The right of decent private citizens to personally possess, transport, and responsibly use arms without government interference is the ultimate freedom and the main pillar supporting all other liberties. Few cultures have allowed their general population access to weapons, the tools of power, to the same degree as the United States. Instead, most societies have restricted the keeping and bearing of arms to a select few power brokers and their agents, often resulting in oppression on a grand scale.
Despite a massive amount of historical evidence to the contrary, there is a substantial body of Americans, many occupying positions of influence, who contend that the abrogation of the Second Amendment is the quickest path to domestic tranquility. Since this is as absurd as advocating blood-letting as a cure for anemia, it would seem advisable to question the motives and mentalities of the gun control advocates themselves.
In my observation, weapon prohibitionists can be broken down into seven major categories. Even though their motives may vary they all pose a mortal threat to liberty.

The opponents of gun rights come in four fundamental categories:

Utopian Idealists – Dreamers willing to ignore human nature (anger, hostility, temper, greed, lust, hunger, poverty, want, megalomania, social pathologies, etc.) in the vain hope for a world where no one ever needs to defend themselves or others; Result: misguided efforts to disarm the public since no one should ever be capable of exerting lethal force for any reason. Fairly rare.

Routine Bigots – Ignorant gun haters who, generally, have never actually seen a real gun much less fired one, and hate what they don’t know; strong corollaries with race haters; Result: Vigorous anti-rights profile if left alone, however they often resolve their blind hatred when education removes the ignorance — frequent anecdotes of such folks “converting” after their first time at a range. Quite common.

Hoplophobes — Unfortunate souls afflicted with a phobic terror of firearms, deserving of pity, and in need of medical attention; Result: Though they should never be involved in setting policy on self-defense, national security, or Second Amendment rights, they often insinuate themselves into such positions, their need for treatment goes unattended, and they cause grievous social harm. Easily mistaken for plain bigots. Too common.

Power Mongers – Like some at the U.N or many anti-gun-rights politicians, they know full well that an armed public interferes with their plans, and they insidiously use lies about the gun issue, and “disarmament (of you but not them) as a road to peace” as a power base and source of support; Result: truly evil, tyrants’ who ultimately suppress human rights, contribute to global genocides, live an elite lifestyle, care not for their fellow citizens. Rare but extremely dangerous.

The right of decent private citizens to personally possess, transport, and responsibly use arms without government interference is the ultimate freedom and the main pillar supporting all other liberties. Few cultures have allowed their general population access to weapons, the tools of power, to the same degree as the United States. Instead, most societies have restricted the keeping and bearing of arms to a select few power brokers and their agents, often resulting in oppression on a grand scale.
Despite a massive amount of historical evidence to the contrary, there is a substantial body of Americans, many occupying positions of influence, who contend that the abrogation of the Second Amendment is the quickest path to domestic tranquility. Since this is as absurd as advocating blood-letting as a cure for anemia, it would seem advisable to question the motives and mentalities of the gun control advocates themselves.
In my observation, weapon prohibitionists can be broken down into seven major categories. Even though their motives may vary they all pose a mortal threat to liberty.

ELITISTS
Many of those in favor of oppressive firearms legislation are best classed as elitists. Elitists frequently identify with a peer group based on wealth, power, rank, social status, occupation, education, ethnic group, etc. and perceive themselves and their peers as inherently superior to and more responsible than the “common people”, thus more deserving of certain rights. Since elitists practically consider those outside their class or caste as members of another species, that most anti-elitist list of laws, the Bill of Rights is viewed by them as anathema. Naturally, the Second Amendment is their first target as it serves as the supporting structure for other nine amendments.

AUTHORITARIANS
Another type of individual who favors the restriction of private gun ownership is the authoritarian. Authoritarian personalities are characterized by their belief in unquestioning obedience to an authority figure or group and a disdain for individual freedom of action, expression, and judgement. Those with authoritarian personalities function well in symbiosis with elitists occupying positions of power. Because authoritarians repress their desires for autonomy they harbor a deep resentment toward free and independent thinkers. Of course, authoritarians do not want firearms in the hands of the general population as this constitutes a major obstacle to fulfilling their pathological and obsessive desire to control people.

CRIMINALS
It goes without saying that career criminals would like to see the public disarmed for obvious reasons. A well-armed population makes crimes such as assault, robbery, and burglary hazardous for the perpetrator and this is bad for “business.” Also, even non-violent or “white collar” criminals live in constant fear of retribution from the public that they financially bleed and would therefore prefer that the public be disarmed. Evidence supporting this hypothesis can be gathered by studying the Second Amendment voting records of those legislators who have been convicted of willful misconduct.

THE FEARFUL
Cowards are easily or excessively frightened by things and situations that are recognized as dangerous, difficult, or painful. It therefore stands to reason that the mere thought of guns and the circumstances in which they are employed causes them abnormal amounts of stress. Rather than admit their weakness to themselves or others, some fearful types jump on the anti-gun bandwagon and purport moral superiority to those “barbaric” enough to employ lethal force against armed assailants by claiming various humanitarian and pragmatic motives for allowing evil to remain unchecked. Many of these individuals harbor an envy induced resentment toward anyone with the means, skill, and will to successfully stand up to criminal aggression.
The desire to assert oneself exists in nearly everyone, wimps included, so cowards seek out tame enemies against whom they can ply their pitiful brand of machismo. Instead of the sociopaths who commit acts of wanton aggression with guns, guns themselves and responsible gun owners are the main targets of their attacks. After all, real criminals are dangerous, so cowards prefer doing battle with inanimate objects that do not have a will of their own and decent law-abiding people whose high level of integrity and self-discipline prevent them from physically lashing out against mere verbal assailants, however obnoxious they may be.

IDEOLOGICAL CHAMELEONS
Ideological chameleons follow the simple social strategy of avoiding controversy and confrontation by espousing the beliefs of the people in their immediate vicinity or advocating the philosophy of those who scream the loudest in a debate. Quite a few supposedly pro Second Amendment public officials have shown themselves to be ideological chameleons when they supported restrictions on the private possession of military style semiautomatic rifles following recent atrocities in which such firearms were employed. Like their reptilian namesake, people who merely blend in with the ambient philosophical foliage seem to have little insight into the moral and social ramifications of their actions. Political and/or economic gain along with avoidance of confrontation are their only goals.

SECURITY MONOPOLISTS
Security monopolists are those members and representatives of public and private security providing concerns who want the means of self-protection out of private hands so that they can command high fees for protecting the citizenry against the rising tide of crime. These profiteers stand to lose a great deal of capital if citizens can efficiently defend themselves. To the security monopolist, each criminal who enters and exits the revolving door of justice is a renewable source of revenue providing jobs for police, social workers, victim counsellors, judges, prison employees, security guards, burglar alarm installers, locksmiths, and others employed by the security monopolies or their satellite organizations. No wonder it is so common for an honest citizen to be more ruthlessly hounded by the authorities when he shoots a criminal in self-defense than a criminal who shoots honest citizens.

THE DYSFUNCTIONALLY UNWORLDLY
Just as a limb will weaken and atrophy if not used, so will aspects of the mind fail to develop if nothing in one’s environment exists to challenge them. People who have led excessively sheltered lives tend to have a difficult time understanding certain cause and effect relationships and an even harder time appreciating just how cruel the world can be. These dysfunction ally unworldly types are truly perplexed at the very notion of firearms ownership regarding defense. To them, tyranny and crime are things that happen in other places far removed from their “civilized” universe. Also, they do not understand the value of private property and why some people would fight for theirs since they never had to work hard to acquire what they possess. While those suffering from dysfunctional unworldliness are most often people who have been born into considerable wealth, this condition is also common in members of the clergy, academicians, practioners of the arts, and others who have spent much of their lives cloistered in a safe and pampering environment. While many of these people may be quite talented and intelligent in some ways, their extreme naivety makes them easy prey for the tyrants who use them for the financial support and favorable advertisement of their regimes. The anti-gun movement is well represented and financed by the dysfunction ally unworldly.
The price of liberty is eternal vigilance, and it behooves all vigilant lovers of liberty to know and be able to recognize the various types of arms prohibitionists and understand their differing but equally dangerous motives. Acquiring knowledge of one’s foes is the first step toward defeating them. We must never forget that a threat to private firearms ownership is a threat to all freedoms.
The inalienable and fundamental right to keep and bear arms which is enumerated by (but predates) the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is not about hunting, gun collecting, or target shooting. Its purpose is to ensure that every responsible American personally possesses the means to defend the Republic from all forms of tyranny, within and without. It is what permits the other nine Amendments in the Bill of Rights to be more than mere hollow phrases on a piece of paper. Its free exercise is the antithesis of serfdom and the only meaningful form of holocaust insurance known to man.
We must never insult and degrade the spirits of our Founding Fathers by permitting the Second Amendment, the pillar of freedom, to be destroyed by the cold flame of legislative ink.

This is all just the big push by Soros the Nazi and his Globalist cabal to make up lost ground, They are tasked with getting Agenda 2030 back on track by any means. Race division and gender divisions is the tactic at the moment. We have allowed too many people into our nation who don’t share the American dream, and worst of all we have allowed Commies to take over our educational system. The youth are being bombarded with propaganda

What trough of bullshit are these people eating from? It is common sense that is supported by multiple studies and well researched statistics that states with a shall issue CCW program and reasonable gun ownership legislation have lower violent crime occurrences. Everything is better in moderation except socialism which should be declared a terrorist organization and banned from existence in the US. I don’t care what “works” in Europe etc. I think most people here are concerned with what works here. Oh yeah, almost forgot….any way we can deport Soros and his sons?

Huh- haven’t shot anyone yet-!

Tho we used to bring our guns to school for class show+tell as well as store them in our lockers to hunt after school (all w/ permission).
Almost all high schools had shooting teams right into the 60’s.
re-
I didn’t consider shooting bullies but when cornered gav’em a “black eye education” why not to be cruel to others …
Try cornering even a rat and they’ll defend themselves with everything they have and you may get hurt.