When I told my brother-in-law about the release of the XD-S Mod.2 in 9mm, he rolled his eyes. He’s a law enforcement officer and a huge gun enthusiast, and his reaction to Springfield’s announcement might have mirrored yours. Sequels of any kind get a bad rap, especially when the original was a huge success. Remember The Emperor’s New Groove 2? Me neither. How about Jaws: The Revenge? Did you even know they made a Jaws sequel? (They made three.)
Springfield’s XD-S wasn’t the first subcompact striker-fired concealed carry pistol, but for years it’s been among the most popular. It, along with Smith & Wesson’s M&P Shield and a few others, ushered in the modern concealed carry movement, and gun owners have been using the XD-S to protect themselves ever since. The ubiquitous articles and videos highlighting the “Top 5 CCW Pistols” always include Springfield’s offering, and for good reason: the XD-S is reliable, cost-effective, and backed by one of the country’s most trusted manufacturers.
Successful firearm sequels balance “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” with real, value-adding improvements. If a manufacturer re-engineers a popular design like the XD-S, they risk losing those features that made the firearm successful in the first place. But if they don’t improve enough components, “new-and-improved” starts to look suspiciously like “the-same-and-more-expensive.”
Those were my thoughts heading into this review, and I think Springfield managed to balance these two extremes well. I conducted my own comparison and spoke with Springfield’s R&D manager to dissect how the company raised the Mod.2 above its predecessor without losing what made the original design so great.
First, the spec sheet!
CALIBER: 9mm
MAGAZINES: 1 – 7 round, flush fitting w/grip X-Tension™ / 1 – 9 round, w/X-Tension™, stainless steel
BARREL: 3.3″ hammer forged, steel, Melonite® / 1:16 RH twist
SIGHTS: Pro-Glo™ Tritium/Luminescent front & tactical rack serrated rear (steel)
FRAME: Black polymer with enhanced grip texture
SLIDE: Forged steel, Melonite® Finish
RECOIL SYSTEM: Dual captive recoil spring with full length guide rod
LENGTH: 6.3″
HEIGHT: 4.3″ with flush mag / 4.85″ w/ mag X-Tension™
GRIP WIDTH: .975”
WEIGHT W/ EMPTY MAG: 21.5 ozs w/flush mag / 22.5 ozs w/ mag X-Tension™
MSRP: $586
Springfield offers two additional Mod.2 models. The standard comes with a fiber-optic front sight instead of the Tritium, which will save you an extra $62 (MSRP: $524). The Viridian model comes with a fiber-optic front sight and a red Viridian laser sight (MSRP: $555).
So, What’s the Difference?
Without further ado, here’s what your $80 will buy if you decided to purchase a Mod.2 over the original.
- Sights
The Mod.2 package with the Tritium front sight isn’t much of a deal, but the Viridian model will reduce your final bill by nearly $70. The Viridian XD-S costs only $31 more than the standard, but those lasers run around $100. If you want a laser sight, purchasing the Mod.2 Viridian will definitely save you some cheddar.
The real improvement comes in the “tactical rack” rear sight. The shape of the sight body allows the firearm to be racked against a hard surface in the event the shooter cannot utilize both hands. You’ll probably never use this feature, but like the firearm itself, you’ll be happy you have it if you ever need it.
On the Tritium and Viridian models, Springfield also cut the rear sight in a U-shape, which provides a more intuitive sight picture with the round front sight. On the standard and Viridian models, the rear sight includes two white dots.
- Grip
Springfield made a number of improvements to the grip. First and most obviously, they replaced the grenade-style texturing with a basket-weave pattern. I haven’t used the grenade-style pattern since I replaced the grips on my XD-S, and I like the Mod.2’s better (Clay says the same). Springfield also rounded the edges on the front and rear of the grip and molded unobtrusive finger grooves into the front. You’ll want to hold the Mod.2 for yourself before making a decision, but I think the pistol’s improvements move it in the right direction.
Springfield also redesigned the grip safety to provide more reliable engagement, slightly extended the beaver tail to help control recoil, and changed the grip geometry to allow for a higher grip closer to the bore axis. I’ve never had a problem with the grip safety on my XD-S, but it’s easy to see how the redesign would allow for better engagement in a one-handed self-defense situation. I landed faster follow-up shots with the Mod.2, and that’s at least partially due to the changes in grip geometry.
- Trigger
The trigger also deserves credit for faster shooting, and I think it’s one of the Mod.2’s most significant improvements. I spoke with Springfield’s R&D Manager, Dave Williams, and while he didn’t share Springfield’s secret sauce (“proprietary methods” is the term, I believe), he did explain that they designed the Mod.2’s trigger mechanism to scale around the 9mm platform.
“The XD-S Mod.2 is much more than just a facelift of the original model,” he said. “The mechanism was redesigned to scale around the 9mm platform and provide an enhanced trigger action over the original. Many components were redesigned to accomplish this task.”
I believe him. For a striker-fired CCW, the Mod.2’s trigger is good. After some pre-travel, the trigger on the model I tested broke between 6.5 and 7 pounds with no over-travel. The reset was crisp and tactile.
- Barrel
If you own an original 9mm XD-S, you’ll also notice Springfield shaved a significant chunk from the thickness of the hammer-forged, Melonite-treated barrel. As with the trigger, Williams told me they designed the barrel specifically for the 9mm cartridge, which doesn’t require the heavier barrel used in the older version.
As for barrel life and longevity, Williams said the new feature has been extensively endurance tested to “well past any normal level.” He mentioned that the XD-S is a favorite among rent-to-shoot ranges, and they designed the Mod.2 with that kind of round count in mind. Springfield’s engineers also subjected the Mod.2 to a major torture test (more on that below), and it passed without a single malfunction.
- Slide
Springfield made some changes to the slide as well. They declined to share details, but I wanted to include these pictures for the benefit of those who wanted a look.
Performance
None of these improvements matter if the firearm can’t function as advertised. The XD-S has always been one of the most reliable handguns in its price range, and I worried a redesign would compromise that reliability.
But the engineers at Springfield did their due diligence before taking the Mod.2 to market. They put the new XD-S through a 25,000-round course of fire without a single failure. To put that in perspective, 25,000 rounds fits in 500 50-round boxes of ammunition and costs $4,500 at $0.18/round. If you went to the range every week and shot two 50-round boxes, it would take you nearly 5 years to complete Springfield’s endurance test.
My experience with the pistol was consistent with the company’s claims. I fired 400 rounds using two different Hornady loads without a single malfunction. I loaded the 7, 8, and 9-round magazines to full capacity and even used the limp-wrist test to try to produce a jam. The gun was oiled, but I didn’t clean it—I just pulled it out of the box and started shooting.
Pocket pistol accuracy is less important than reliability but still worth noting. At 15 feet from a bag rest, the gun consistently produced 0.8-1” groups. Works for me.
Finally, while ergonomics improvements have been made, the XDS Mod.2 retains the same great concealability as the original.
Conclusion
Springfield improved the Mod.2 based on one simple premise: to design a 9mm handgun around the cartridge rather than simply shrinking the 45 ACP model to fire a 9mm. The result retains the same reliability and performance while shrinking the grip width, improving the trigger, and lightening the barrel. The improvements aren’t massive, but taken together they add more value to the handgun than you’ll spend over the original. Improved ergonomics, better sights, and longer slide serrations make for a more comfortable shooting experience and, more importantly, better handling in a self-defense situation.
The XD-S Mod.2 is, in other words, a sequel worth the price of admission.
The XDS Mod 2 9 mm is an awesome little conceal carry the trigger A+, the sights A+ the ergonomics A+ and most of all the reliability A++ . Everything you want and need in a carry inside the waist .
Have a xds9mm mod 2 on order sold my xds9mm to my son I guess I will see just how good it really is schould know in a couple of days.
I own the xd 5.25 9mm match, xds 9mm and xdm 3.8 45cap. Have fired thousands of mixed rounds through the first two and a couple hundred through the latter with zero malfunctions. Able to consistently drop all six 6″ steel plates @ 25yds with all three pistols. I retired from Georgia police department that was one of, if not the first agency to adopt the Glock as the only sidearm for it’s entire personnel.
Having fired thousands of rounds through both brands I am not hesitant to claim;
I would climb over a mountain of Glocks to get my hands on a Springfield xd series pistol!
Hope I didn’t offend any Glock disciples?
I have Spgfld XD 4 inch Service model that may be 20 years old by now and is certainly a runner up that stands side by side with the Glock 19 (in my opinion). It’s a great pistol that may be complimented by the addition of new models, but it fits so well and it just keeps running and so does not need to be replaced. Though I like and own newer designs, my single stacked, yesteryear Sig P225 is another proven design of an ergonomic, 9mm that is hard to beat. A good design sells itself, hope this new XD can enjoy the same fame, but I expect they will replace it next year anyhow. All the same… whether I buy it or it goes to another guy/gal, I welcome the next new pistol and the freedom we have to own it,
the 1st xds’s were not a success, remember the recall? they kept my gun for 4 months, ( supposed to have it 6 to 8 weeks) because they didnt know how to fix the flawed design, because they dont make the xds!. and now we are supposed to be impressed that they designed a 9mm barrel, for a 9mm gun? what genius’s they are. ( not ) and just how many new grip designs can one company make? why cant they figure out how to do it correctly?
and we all know about the great history of guns made in croatia… err wait, what great design has ever come out of croatia? these arent even made by springfield armory, they merely slap their logo on it and mark up the price, selling it as if it’s their gun. but what would you expect from a company who bought the name and now claim to be the original springfield armory, which they are not.
when my xds came back from the factory after the recall, I sold it immediately without ever opening up the box. I should thank S.A., if they didn’t build such a crappy gun, I wouldn’t have my Officers 1911 that I replaced it with. and it’s the best gun I have ever had. over 5 years of running flawlessly now, couldn’t say that about my xds after 30 days of owning it, and then sending that p.o.s. back to springfield armory. they had my xds 4 times longer than i did!. plus I had terrible customer service (worst I have ever dealt with ) and will never buy another springfield armory gun because of that.
That was quite a gripe session. I own an XDM and love it. Five of my friends own Springfield XD series and we’re all quite happy. Sorry you’re not and sorry you’re sore about it. Obviously, given Springfield’s success, you are in the minority.
Are those Talon Grips on the original? I have them on all my guns including the original XDS 45.
Larry a superior well built weapon
I just bought the XDE-9 and it works perfectly. Seems that they adopted some of those features.
Owned the original XDS 3.3 9mm but wasn’t impressed with ergonomics so interested in trying the mod 2 out.
I looked at and held a lot of pistols before making the Mod 2 my choice in 45. I carry appendix, I’m slim built with a little beer belly sticking out, it is very comfortable and tucks away almost invisible if not completely. The trigger is good, points instinctively, and the lighter weight of my 1911 is beyond compare. If your in the market, I would whole heartedly recommend looking at the XD-S Mod 2
I would like to know where you got the grip tape to cover the original XDS. I had to buy the XDE just because. and now seeing what Magazines will fit both. So far the 5 round is the only XDS mag that won’t work in the XDE. Now to see if my streamlight laser light will fit.
Too bad they have discounted the XD-s in the 4″ barrel length. Much better in my opinion. Won’t go back to a 3.3 so that leaves me out of getting the Mod 2.
I have the original and what I like best are the size adjustable grips and the grenade feel of the grips. There is no way that I would trade this for the newer style grip, because this is the one thing that really differentiates this gun from all others. When you shoot it feels more like the recoil of a full size glock without the bulk. The sites are great and I installed the green front site that came in the box, since I feel it is best in all lighting conditions. I’d rate it as the best gun of this sort on the market, so no trade in for me. Strictly for CC however, I’d like to see a smaller lighter weight model, even though I realize that it could damage some of the features I so like.
I purchased a XD in .45 4″ years ago and loved the accuracy and the reliability. I now have a MOD 2 .45 for the size to conceal carry every day and love it. Same accuracy same reliability just in a smaller package.
SA pistols are among the best built and most reliable striker-fired pistols I’ve ever had–the original 45 XD is still among my favorites. I’m dubious of anyone’s judgement that would roll their eyes over them.
I sold my .45 3.3 to get the 4.0 when it came out. I think that I’ll keep it.
Been looking at one of these 9MM to buy.
Awe, NUTS! Now I gotta’ get one.