nfa

William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, recently addressed this common yet critical issue, offering essential advice to those who find themselves in this predicament.

The ATF is proposing a new scheme that would add new regulations to firearms with stabilizing braces, classifying many of them as tightly-regulated items.

The ATF is clarifying an earlier position on the definitions of “pistol” and “firearm” with regard to stabilizing braces.

The Supreme Court decided against hearing petitions from men prosecuted for the illegal manufacture and purchase of suppressors in Kansas.

“The FBI has taken this absurd position that, ‘We’re not going to process this appeal because it’s not for a Title I firearm,’” he explained. “They say that for the NFA, it’s completely different. You don’t have a right to appeal it, so you’re basically SOL. And I think that’s just wrong.”

One of the hottest firearms introductions of 2017, announced at the SHOT Show in Las Vegas, was undoubtedly Mossberg’s 590 Shockwave, which was originally chambered in 12 gauge. Right on its heels came Remington with the 870 Tac-14, another wildly popular defense shotgun, and yet another confirmation of the worth of a compact shotgun that can be had without climbing a Mount Everest of bureaucratic red tape.

Bump stock. AutoGlove. What’s the difference? Both accessories, as  we’re told by industry folk, “simulate full auto fire.” The ATF classified the former as a “firearm part” and the latter as a “machine gun.”

The Tuscarawas County Sheriff’s Office in Ohio is auctioning off a Depression-era relic to raise money for new, modern guns.

This might be the best meme I’ve seen to sum up the foolishness that is the National Firearms Act.