News

(Photo: ATF) Estimated reading time: 2 minutes The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) applauds a recent Fifth Circuit Court ruling. The ruling comes from the case VanDerStok v. Garland. It challenges the right of two federal agencies to regulate non-firearms as firearms. SAF actively opposed the ATF’s redefinition of frames and receivers. The court didn’t delay [...]

“I’m with ATF, he’s on a list of some devices that he purchased for firearms that he should not [possess],” one agent is heard saying. The agent was apparently addressing the father of the citizen on the list.

Police say the Philly woman came home late Sunday night to find four men in her house without an invitation.

They argue that Raskin downplayed Hunter Biden’s illegal firearm purchase by framing it as a wealthy individual exercising his Second Amendment rights.

Most participants—primarily Black men—described facing constant threats of harm and violence. An overwhelming 89% had friends or family shot. Fear was a driving factor for them to carry guns, with 75% fearing their own deaths and 72% fearing harm to their families.

The ruling concluded that Oregon’s Measure 114 complies with the Second Amendment. It aligns with the U.S. tradition of “regulating uniquely dangerous features of weapons and firearms to protect public safety.”

In a bold move challenging Hawaii’s restrictive gun law, the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) has filed a supportive amicus brief for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction.

Massachusetts lawmakers are so drastically overreaching with a 140-page gun control proposal that local police departments are flashing lights and blaring sirens because it is just that bad.

For California residents, the search to find an adequate handgun for personal and family protection can be quite difficult.