The only thing that Rittenhouse was guilty of was a case of stupidity. The (MAGA?) judge actually did his job…as he should have. And I am sure the Feds will charge Rittenhouse with a violation of the rights of the deceased and injured…but think the Feds will lose again. Like Rittenhouse if the deceased and wounded had not been there and not attacked Rittenhouse they would still be alive. . And if the police had been allowed to do their job as they should be allowed to…the riot would probably been a “mostly” peaceful demonstration. As far as I know looting rioting and arson are still against the law. The way some such as he/she/him/her/it or whatever he wants to call themselves look at it all the death and destruction from all those stupid riots was just a “legal” protest! The judge didn’t find Rittenhouse not guilty…the jury did!
Blue Dog (he/him)November 23, 2021, 1:04 pm
You know, the policemen that beat Rodney King were acquitted in their first trial too. And then the feds changed them with infringing on Rodney King’s civil rights and the jury found them guilty the second go around. Something tells me that a statesman like Merrick Garland is judge shopping right now and the feds will succeed where the state failed justice once already and this time with an impartial judge as opposed to some MAGA lifer who should have been retired years ago.
HondoNovember 26, 2021, 7:16 am
More imbecilic drivel from the site troll , blue douche why you just f*** O** !
KaneNovember 26, 2021, 10:00 pm
I wonder what amazing achievements the rioter in LA with the street name “football” realized after Chief Gates had him arrested. Or maybe he just built a rap sheet thicker than an Obama biography and spawned a brood of illegititmate children.
How about looking at more recent cases like the one involving a Black man named Roderick Scott who shot and killed a a young White man named Christopher Cervinni (sp?) in Greece, New York. Cervinni was allegedly was breaking into cars and was supposed to have been shot in the back. How come a case like that never makes the national news?
Why do people like you never look at the other side of the coin? Was the killing by Scott justified? Would a vicious Demshevik like Merrick Garland ever look at the Scott case? Of course the answer is NO.
It’s too bad that the sub-peons on the left will never figure out that their masters in government and the fake press just exploit their gullable constituents.
The only thing that Rittenhouse was guilty of was a case of stupidity. The (MAGA?) judge actually did his job…as he should have. And I am sure the Feds will charge Rittenhouse with a violation of the rights of the deceased and injured…but think the Feds will lose again. Like Rittenhouse if the deceased and wounded had not been there and not attacked Rittenhouse they would still be alive. . And if the police had been allowed to do their job as they should be allowed to…the riot would probably been a “mostly” peaceful demonstration. As far as I know looting rioting and arson are still against the law. The way some such as he/she/him/her/it or whatever he wants to call themselves look at it all the death and destruction from all those stupid riots was just a “legal” protest! The judge didn’t find Rittenhouse not guilty…the jury did!
You know, the policemen that beat Rodney King were acquitted in their first trial too. And then the feds changed them with infringing on Rodney King’s civil rights and the jury found them guilty the second go around. Something tells me that a statesman like Merrick Garland is judge shopping right now and the feds will succeed where the state failed justice once already and this time with an impartial judge as opposed to some MAGA lifer who should have been retired years ago.
More imbecilic drivel from the site troll , blue douche why you just f*** O** !
I wonder what amazing achievements the rioter in LA with the street name “football” realized after Chief Gates had him arrested. Or maybe he just built a rap sheet thicker than an Obama biography and spawned a brood of illegititmate children.
How about looking at more recent cases like the one involving a Black man named Roderick Scott who shot and killed a a young White man named Christopher Cervinni (sp?) in Greece, New York. Cervinni was allegedly was breaking into cars and was supposed to have been shot in the back. How come a case like that never makes the national news?
Why do people like you never look at the other side of the coin? Was the killing by Scott justified? Would a vicious Demshevik like Merrick Garland ever look at the Scott case? Of course the answer is NO.
It’s too bad that the sub-peons on the left will never figure out that their masters in government and the fake press just exploit their gullable constituents.