No, it’s not. Read what retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens was granted space in The New York Times to say. Repeal the Second Amendment. Did democrats and the left attack him for this? No, they cheered. They paid for space to say it.

Anti-gun-rights crusaders keep calling for new and improved background checks. You know why. They dance in the blood of victims, using tragedy to manipulate for their goals. It’s what they do. Bottom line, they don’t want checks, they want all the guns.

While people in mass media on the left and right continue to harp about proposed confiscations, forced “buybacks,” sales bans and contrabanding AR-15s and AK-47s, there is no way either party or any candidate can attack those guns in isolation.

Americans don’t realize that the safety promised by “red flag” laws will be dangerously lost, if red-flagged people become enraged

By providing “the oxygen of publicity,” as Margaret Thatcher called it, media encourages copycats, which the murderers themselves tell us they seek. Doesn’t that imply at least some measure of complicity or guilt?

News outlets that feature and name mass murderers border on criminality. They don’t advance news — they encourage copycats.

Or would it? When you read about the trials and tribulations following a self-defense shooting, it makes your blood run cold. It’s not fair.

Voters get no choice–Only government agents to be properly armed; No limit to officials’ firepower, or raw power. “Media is not woke on this issue”

New York City bans taking your licensed sidearm out of the city, for any reason, and their local courts have approved of this law