{"id":18789,"date":"2014-04-19T14:08:50","date_gmt":"2014-04-19T18:08:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.gunsamerica.com\/blog\/?p=18789"},"modified":"2026-01-26T11:45:28","modified_gmt":"2026-01-26T17:45:28","slug":"taurus-view-glowing-innovation-or-glitzy-gimmick-new-gun-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gunsamerica.com\/digest\/taurus-view-glowing-innovation-or-glitzy-gimmick-new-gun-review\/","title":{"rendered":"Taurus View – Light, Pocketable Titanium & Lexan Revolver \u2014New Gun Review"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"The<\/a>

The new View from Taurus has a look all its own.<\/p><\/div>\n

By\u00a0 Wayne Lincourt
\nTaurus International Manufacturing<\/a><\/p>\n

The new Taurus View with the transparent Lexan side plate was unveiled at the January SHOT Show in Las Vegas. Since then there have been several brief but glowing reviews based on limited time with the gun at the show. We wanted to see for ourselves\u2014is all the hype deserved? Or is it just a gimmick to sell guns? At scarcely over half a pound, with a titanium cylinder and barrel, there is hardly a gun in the market to even compete with the View at a street price of around $500. But with an extremely lightweight revolver<\/a>, in the venerable .38 Special, always comes punishing recoil, which I’ll get to. The Lexan panel is nifty, and does have some actual use, but to me what makes this gun stand out is the extreme pocket-ability and light weight at a competitive price to the tiny semi-autos in the comparable 9mm. And while the gun isn’t perfect, all of these mostly positive reviews showcase a new direction for Taurus, with vastly improved quality control and customer service, at the same Taurus affordable prices. The View isn’t for everyone. She kicks pretty hard. But if an extremely lightweight and reliable revolver is on your bucket list, we found the Taurus View to be well worth your attention.<\/p>\n

According to Taurus Holdings\u2019 President and CEO, Mark Kresser, the View was designed specifically for concealed carry. Choosing a daily carry gun, of course, is a very personal choice and affected by such things as how you dress, your job or profession, your size, strength and a host of other personal factors. However, in the end, what you must achieve is a reasonable balance between the key elements every self defense gun must meet.<\/p>\n

\"You<\/a>

You can see why Taurus calls this a mini revolver, even in my small hand.<\/p><\/div>\n

Since Taurus emphasized concealability, let\u2019s start there. The gun is indeed small. Taurus calls it a \u201cmicro,\u201d and at an overall size of 5.5\u201dLx3.6\u201dHx 1.35\u201dW, micro it is. It weighed in at 9.5 ounces empty, 11.6 ounces loaded with five Federal Premium light recoil 110 grain Hydra-Shok rounds. (That\u2019s a good load for this gun, by the way.) The grip is .81\u201d thick at the top, tapering to .31\u201d at the bottom, and it\u2019s .9\u201d front to back at its narrowest. The lack of an external hammer, the short barrel, light weight and the tiny grip all contribute to ease of concealment.<\/p>\n

The ultimate purpose of a self-defense firearm, of course, is to stop a deadly attack. That makes the caliber an important consideration. Personally, I\u2019d prefer to carry nothing smaller than a .454 Casull or .44 Magnum. Unfortunately, guns chambered for those calibers tend to be a bit big and heavy, and the recoil can be brutal. So, as in any firearm choice, we begin to compromise. For a more concealable gun, we choose a smaller caliber. Is .38 special an acceptable compromise? Regardless of what you might think of the venerable .38 round, it has proven to be an adequate chambering for the close-in self defense role\u2026provided your shots are well-placed. Which brings us to the next consideration\u2014accuracy.<\/p>\n

\"The<\/a>

The cylinder is obviously the widest part.<\/p><\/div>\n

Shootability might be a more precise term, since accuracy depends on several factors including handling. We\u2019re not interested in determining the absolute accuracy of a gun fired from a mechanical rest where it\u2019s securely clamped in place, but how it functions in real terms for a flesh and blood human being. That brings into consideration such factors as sight radius, trigger pull and felt recoil, as well as ergonomic factors like grip size, orientation of the bore axis to the grip angle and the general fit of the gun in your hand.<\/p>\n

The View has a very short 1.41\u201d barrel. Good for concealability, but not necessarily for accuracy. A short barrel provides a short sight radius, meaning that the slightest deviation from your ideal sight picture can result in a wide dispersion of shots. The View is also very light\u20149.5 ounces. Again, good for ease of carry, but the lower the weight, the greater the felt recall. Combined with a small grip, this could have a negative impact on accuracy, both through anticipation of the recoil (or flinch), and through making it more difficult to remain on target for follow-up shots.<\/p>\n

\"The<\/a>

The front blade and rear groove sights are typical of a snub nose revolver.<\/p><\/div>\n

These thoughts were going through my head when I went to the range. I brought my shooting gloves, just in case. Turns out, I needed them. This is not a fun gun to shoot. I started with Herter\u2019s 158 grain full metal jacket (FMJ) in .38 Special, not 38+P. The recoil wasn\u2019t just brutal, it hurt! You might think I\u2019m just a wimp, and you may be right, but I regularly shoot a .44 magnum revolver and 45 automatics with no problems. I put on my gloves to give the web of my hand some protection. That\u2019s when I noticed the trigger guard smacking my middle finger. I ended up with a one finger grip while wearing the gloves to eliminate the bruising. I could still control the muzzle with just one finger on the grip but that is not the way you want to hold a self-defense gun. You want a secure grip so your assailant can\u2019t snatch it away from you and so you don\u2019t drop it at just the wrong time.<\/p>\n

Using a standard sight picture, the front blade centered in the rear notch and the top of the blade even with the top of the notch, the gun shot 6\u201d high at 7 yards (shooting offhand from a standing position). By lowering my aiming point to the bottom of the 12\u201d target I was able to consistently put five rounds within 2 \u00bd\u201d of the target center.<\/p>\n

\"The<\/a>

The trigger was smooth throughout the stroke and broke cleanly at 11 pounds.<\/p><\/div>\n

Drawing from concealment and firing with a two-finger grip, I was able to put two rounds in the kill zone. However, my draw was slowed by the fact that it was difficult to get a solid hold on the vestigial grip. A secure grasp of the gun is crucial because you definitely don\u2019t want to drop it. Handling aside, the accuracy of the gun is actually surprisingly good for limited-range engagements, no doubt due in large part to the excellent double-action trigger. The trigger was smooth with a clean break at about 11 pounds. I have to add that 11 pounds is an acceptable weight for a double-action-only gun (DAO), although it didn\u2019t feel that heavy due to the smoothness of the action. On the other hand, the combination of a tiny grip and the substantial felt recoil detracts from the handling. You should know that I have relatively small hands and the grip seemed too small to me. If you have average to large hands, better try one out before parting with your hard-earned cash.<\/p>\n

So the View fires an acceptable self-defense round given the light weight and small size of the gun. Concealability and carry weight are both excellent if that\u2019s your primary concern. Real world accuracy is also more than sufficient to get the job done provided you practice frequently, something I doubt you\u2019d want to do.\u00a0Last but definitely not least, is dependability. In fact, based on my personal combat experience, dependability is the single most important consideration in selecting a self-defense gun. When you\u2019re confronted with that deadly threat, if your gun doesn\u2019t function properly, you might as well be carrying a rock because that\u2019s the level of protection you\u2019ll have. In other words, when you\u2018re betting your life, make sure it\u2019s a sure thing.<\/p>\n

\"Taurus<\/a>

Taurus cut down on the size of the ejection rod in an effort to shave weight. It\u2019s still long enough to do the job, though.<\/p><\/div>\n

Unfortunately, firing 30 or 40 rounds doesn\u2019t prove how well a gun will serve you over the long haul. I prefer to have a minimum of 500 malfunction-free rounds down range before I trust my life to any gun. It also helps if the gun in question has a history of reliability. The View is built on the Model 85 frame with a titanium cylinder and stainless-steel-lined titanium barrel. The frame is aluminum alloy. The model 85 has been Taurus\u2019 meat-and-potatoes gun for several decades. It\u2019s also the official sidearm of the Singapore police force patrol officers.<\/p>\n

Taurus has a lot of experience building lightweight aluminum alloy and titanium model 85s, so not much of the View is really new and untested with the exception of the Lexan side panel. My first reaction to that was, it\u2019s interesting but what\u2019s the purpose? After more consideration, I decided that it had real functional value after all. When dependability is paramount, being able to see the normally hidden little links and levers in the guts of your gun means that you can visually verify their condition without having to tear the gun down. It also means that the manufacturer needs to pay more attention to making sure those parts are right. A double benefit.<\/p>\n

\"This<\/a>

This is what my test gun looked like right out of the box. The Lexan is cracked and you can see from the way the front screw is buggered up that someone did it intentionally.<\/p><\/div>\n

According to a Taurus spokesman, the company took a long time to find a clear cover that was stiff, but that had enough give that it wouldn\u2019t crack, even if you over-tightened one of the screws. The gun I received from Taurus had a couple of cracks in the Lexan, and it was cracked and crazed under the forward screw. There are two things you should know about that. First, this was a test and evaluation gun that goes out to a lot of reviewers. I\u2019m sure it didn\u2019t come off the assembly line like that. Second, you can break anything if you try hard enough. Airport baggage handlers prove that every day. The cracks didn\u2019t concern me. Whoever had it before me obviously set out to crack the Lexan, and they achieved what they intended. I wouldn\u2019t be concerned about it. The gun has a lifetime warranty. Send it back to Taurus and they\u2019ll replace the Lexan. Treat it like you have half a brain, and it\u2019s not likely that it will crack in the first place. The Lexan panel is not a structural component. It\u2019s not something you have to worry about.<\/p>\n

At one point, Taurus Brazil had a reputation for shoddy quality control. That has changed dramatically over the years, and Taurus has been delivering a much higher level of workmanship for some time. Since I never owned a Taurus Model 85, I scoured the online forums and came to the conclusion that the vast majority of Model 85 owners are quite happy with their guns. In fact, it\u2019s one of the most popular guns that Taurus builds.In short, I wouldn\u2019t be concerned with dependability. The Model 85 is a straightforward design with a very good history and a lifetime warranty to back it up. On top of that, it\u2019s a revolver. Wheel guns have a superior record where dependability is concerned due to fewer moving parts and the lack of dependence on the round firing. If it doesn\u2019t go bang when you pull the trigger, just pull it again on a fresh round. You can\u2019t do that with a semiautomatic.<\/p>\n

\"The<\/a>

The gun took the shooting well. The shooter, not so much.<\/p><\/div>\n

MSRP for the Taurus View is $599, although I\u2019ve seen it on sale for about $100 less.<\/p>\n

So to answer the question posed at the beginning, the Lexan panel is a little gimmicky, but it does have some redeeming value as far as maintenance and inspections are concerned. That contributes to reliability, or at least to your confidence in the gun. There\u2019s no question that it\u2019s an easy gun to conceal and delivers a sufficient level of accuracy. Since Taurus set out to build a very light gun with a vestigial grip, their execution is admirable. However, shootability\/handling suffers due exclusively to the abbreviated grip and very light weight.<\/p>\n

If your primary interest is in a last ditch hideout gun where concealability is your number one concern, the View has the elements to provide you with a gun you can depend on. However, if you want a more reasonable balance between concealability and shootability, there are better choices. The Ruger LCR, for example, is only \u00be\u201d longer and taller, weighs just 4 ounces more than the View, and is actually slightly narrower. Plus it\u2019s a nice gun to shoot.<\/p>\n

Like I said earlier, selecting a daily carry gun is a personal choice, a matter of balance. Make sure the equation works for you.<\/p>\n

Taurus View Ballistics:
\nAmmunition\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Average Muzzle Velocity\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Standard Deviation\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Average Group Size*<\/span><\/p>\n

Herter\u2019s 38 Spcl 158gr FMJ\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 742.260fps\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a03.344fps\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 4.125\u201d<\/p>\n

Federal 38 Spcl Low Recoil\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 809.325fps\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 5.575fps\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 3.495\u201d
\n110gr Hydra-Shok<\/p>\n

*Groups fired from an unsupported standing position at a range of 7 yards.<\/p>\n\n\t\t