Estimated reading time: 9 minutes
If I were in Ruger’s marketing department and in charge of marketing their semi-auto handguns, I know which strategy I’d use. The phrase would be, “Pretty good, pretty cheap.” That tells you everything you need to know about Ruger’s semi-autos. It perfectly encapsulates all of them, including the now seemingly ancient Ruger P89.
Firearms writer Tamara Keel once described the Ruger P89 as a 9mm Mullet, which also perfectly encapsulates this gun. The Ruger P series premiered in 1985 and lasted until 2013. The P85 series was subject to numerous small improvements over its lifespan. In 1989, the P85 became the P85 MKII, and in 1989, the P85 MKII became subject to even more improvements. In 1989, the P85 became the P89 series.
Table of contents
Inside the P89
Ruger’s P89 series became the most popular of the P series. The P Series continued beyond the 89, and there was a 90, 91, 93, 94, 994, 95, 97, and 345. Most of these guns were just the P89 in different calibers. The P89 was produced until 2009. It had a good run and arguably is part of the flood of early Wonder Nine Pistols.
The P89 features a DA/SA design, but DAO models are also available. Shooters get a 15-round double-stack magazine and a slide-mounted safety/decocker. The gun has a short recoil operation, a P220-type locking system, and a Browning-style tilting barrel.
The gun weighed 32 ounces and had a 4.5-inch barrel and an overall length of 7.75 inches. While the P89 is typically 9mm, Ruger produced a P89X with both a 9mm barrel and a .30 Luger barrel.
Ruger specifically worked to produce an affordable modern pistol. The gun isn’t fancy. It shreds off any sense of pretentiousness. I half expect it to come with a case of Miller Lite and an American flag bandana. Ruger drove down the cost by using investment-cast parts. Casting is much cheaper than forging and machining and, when done correctly, can be just as tough.
Cast parts tend to be overly bulky and butt ugly. You’re not finding a rich-blued finish with the Ruger P89. You’re getting a basic, bare-bones pistol that’s blocky and heavy. Cheap pistols tend to be crappy pistols. You get what you pay for.
The P89 – Defying Expectations
The Ruger P89 and the entire P series defy that stereotype. Ruger developed the original P85 for the U.S. Military’s JSSAP M9 contest, which the Beretta M9 eventually won. It met all the requirements, including a 20,000-round life expectancy. However, the engineers at Ruger couldn’t get away with a dog eating my homework excuse. They didn’t finish the firearm in time for the 1984 contest.
The P85 did enter the XM10 trials, which were conducted in 1988. The gun performed well, but the Beretta 92 still won. The P85 was adopted by the Turkish National Police. The Ruger KP95D was adopted by branches of the Iraqi Army in 2004.
The hammer-fired Ruger found limited success with police forces. For the era, Ruger offered an affordable, durable, reliable, and modern pistol that was several hundred dollars cheaper than the competition. Police in San Diego, Chicago, Wisconsin, and beyond carried the affordable P-Series.
That’s not a bad provenance for an unassuming and affordable handgun.
Ergonomically Different
The Ruger P89 has some ergonomic, how do we say it nicely, challenges. It’s not bad, but it’s different. The gun is dummy-thick. It makes modern Instagram girls look scrawny. The grip is around 1.35 inches wide, making it thicker than something like a Glock. It can feel like a 2×4 in your hand. That’s the main downside of the gun and a downside of the use of cast versus milled or forged.
The P89 does have some highlights. While I’m not a fan of slide-mounted safeties, the Ruger’s isn’t bad. It’s aided by its mass because it’s huge. Unlike other slide-mounted safeties, the P89 is a massive, ambidextrous safety and decocker device. It’s easy to hit and easy to use.
Speaking of ambidextrous, the P89 was ahead of its time. The gun featured an ambidextrous safety and a truly ambidextrous magazine release. It’s an odd magazine release. It’s pressed forward towards the trigger guard rather than inward. The magazine release is small but fairly easy to work. It’s different, and the closest I’ve seen to any replication is the CZ P series.
The grip angle rakes back fairly rearward. It’s not uncomfortable, and I don’t think the grip angle matters all that much. The P89 feels comfortable in the hand in most ways, except it’s a bit wider than you’d imagine.
Blasting Away
It’s time to load mags and drop hammers. I only had a single mag, but that’s enough for now. The slide on the P89 is surprisingly easy to operate. It’s not very stiff or very difficult to operate. If you pop the hammer down manually the slide becomes even easier to rack and operate. With some basic brass-cased 115-grain ammo, I let the lead fly.
The gun’s weight translates to fairly mild recoil. It’s a 9mm that weighs over 30 ounces. It’s not going to beat you up too badly. The recoil could be lighter, but the heavier reciprocating slide does add some sting to the recoil. Guns like the Glock, modern SIGs, and Walthers all have less recoil and snap to them, but the P89 is still controllable.
You could put long strings of fire on target without a great deal of difficulty. You might not be as fast with the Ruger, but you can go fast enough to shoot defensively. If I’m shooting a Bill Drill, I might be a half-second slower with the Ruger than a Glock.
Hitting Dings
The sights are somewhat small compared to modern sights, but still very useable. Acquiring the sights and get them on target isn’t tough. The rear sight is a thin notch, and the front sight is a serrated blade. The small size makes it easy to see targets are further than average distances, but the all-black design can be tougher to acquire when going quickly.
A little white nail polish might go a long way. I found the P89 to be decently accurate. It’s a gun that makes short work of IPSC-sized A Zones but doesn’t produce those superbly tight groups. You might be disappointed if you want to make trick shots are long ranges. From a realistic defensive standpoint, the gun’s accurate enough to get the job done.
If I wanted something to punch holes as tight as possible, this ain’t it. At distances of 25 yards, I could hit a 10-inch gong, but nothing smaller. Again, for realistic defensive applications, it’s fine, but for long-range engagements, you might find it lacking.
READ MORE: Arex Delta Gen. 2: More Than What You Pay For
We get a surprisingly nice trigger. The double action rolls nicely, and the single action is fairly short, but it won’t give you 1911-like impressions. It punches above its weight class, for sure.
The Ruger P89 – Affordable, Durable, Capable
The Ruger P89 is still remarkably affordable. If you want a budget-worthy gun, the Ruger P89 has occupied that slot for 35 years. It’s still a viable option, even if it’s not optics or light-ready. The Ruger P89 is not fancy and never was. It’s not the most accurate gun, and the trigger isn’t match grade, but it works and works well. It lives up to the imaginary Ruger slogan of “Pretty good, pretty cheap.”
*** Buy and Sell on GunsAmerica! All Local Sales are FREE! ***
I bought one new in 1996. I still enjoy shooting it. My wife learned on it and it’s her go-to when she shoots for qualification. While we have graduated to the more Gucci guns as our financial position improved, the P89 is still one of the best firearms purchases we have made.
Have a P89DC model. Built like a tank! Like a 1911, not the fanciest handgun, but one that will go bang every time. And like a 1911, this is a great handgun for when the S&(t Hits the Fan situation. Note also that 17 round magazines are available.
10 photos… all of the left side of the pistol. Maybe flip it over to illustrate the ambidextrous features? How about an angle of the “dummy-thick” width? Or the sights? Or basically anything other than the left side?!?
Have both a late model P85 and a P89 both S/S
I have never had an issue with either pistol .Clean oil them they will run forever. I was fortunate to work in Pine Tree Castings Newport NH in the late 80,s Early 90,s
I got to see this pistol from the molds for the parts to the finished product
Also got to speak to great employees
Ruger is a proud gun maker
ruger is a true treasure and i have this collection one of my favorites
I’ve always liked the P95. I sold them to two of my sons. Back in the day it was the “poor man’s” Beretta M9. Everything in this article rings true to me. The P38 style controls will never totally go out of style. in my opinion. I favor Glock/M&P style actions now, but I have no problem with my P95. I just like Glock better now. Stay safe. j
My oldest son has one of these in .45 ACP and although I never fired it, I love the feel of that gun in my hand, it is awesome and I told him if you ever want to get rid of it, you gotta call me first, but he never will! 👏🏽 👍🏼☺️
I bought a P89 new when they came out. I still have it. I like it. Every time I go to the range it attracts people asking questions and they end up shooting it. I found it to be more than accurate and it manages recoil like crazy. It is heavy, but that helps steady it up.
I own a P89 in 9MM, P90 in .45 ACP and two P94’s in .40 S&W…. all are shooters!
These were just coming out, IIRC, when I was new LEO having to provide my own duty gun. I remember looking at them and thinking they were ugly as hell and didn’t give them a second thought. I went with a second hand S&W 59 which was also fairly big and heavy but looked elegant by comparison in my opinion. Ah the ignorance of being young. The S&W was a very good gun for the time but the Ruger proved to be every bit as reliable and accurate. Now I look back and think I should have bought one when they were cheaper because while being tanks, they are still very good guns. Over the years I’ve become a huge Ruger fan so maybe I’ll pick one up if the price is right.
How many ‘ughs’ on this one? I never cared for the P-89-90 series guns, and I’m a big Ruger fan. Clunky, cumbersome come to mind.
I have owned one in my collection for a few years. I like it, as I have large hands, The thickness of the frame, with some nice Hogue grips, feels like it’s fitted to my hand. I was surprised by your giving the trigger a good review. On firing first round, in DA mode, hammer down, pull feels long, and effort is high. Which is expected as much as your actuating the trigger mechanism. Follow up shots are in SA, and the trigger is pretty good Starting DA, then going to SA, took a bit of getting used to but is nice to be able to carry one in the chamber, hammer down with the safety engaged. And yes, I like having a safety on a weapon. Actually engaging the safety and it dropping the hammer is still slightly scary (with a round in the chamber). Always done safety pointed down range and putting my thumb in between the hammer and slide. Yes, I know it moves the firing pin out of the way, but old habits. But it is reliable as can be, just as you said. I started with 1911’s, (still have), and moved to the Beretta M9, and don’t favor the newer Glocks, etc.. So maybe why I like it. I think it’s a good value. I’ve never had an issue with mine.