R2KBA

One of the silliest arguments about the purposes of the Second Amendment is put forward this way. The newly formed Constitutional government would never have created an amendment with the purpose of destroying the government just created.

A Democratic Congressman reintroduced legislation last Friday that would place a 1000 percent excise tax on so-called “assault weapons” and “high-capacity magazines.”

The motion to dismiss the charges against Hannah Gutierrez-Reed has been denied by New Mexico Judge Mary Marlowe.

“No veteran should be considered ‘defective’ simply because they need help managing their finances; and they certainly shouldn’t be forwarded to DOJ for additional screening because of it,” he continued.

GOA has already announced plans to file a lawsuit to block this rule, but that does not absolve Congress of its responsibility to use every means necessary to defend the Second Amendment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRjmPHZs628 Estimated reading time: 1 minute Rick Ector is a Michigan gun rights advocate and firearms instructor. Ector has dedicated over a decade of his life to advancing women’s self-defense education. His work, under the auspices of his own group, Legally Armed in Detroit, has been consistently backed by the Gun Owners of America (GOA). [...]

Carlson claims, “At that time the state militia was the slave patrol. So, if the federal government, by virtue of the U.S. Constitution, didn’t protect a state’s right to have a militia or in other words, a slave patrol, that could fundamentally undermine the system of slavery that was integral to the United States at its founding.”

“This is a significant win for gun rights,” noted SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb, “because the arguments in this case are essentially the same as we are making in our own challenge of the pistol brace rule.”

The wife told CBS13, “He saw me and we made eye contact and the next thing I know I am jumping out of bed because the glass is breaking.”