Naked Home Invader Jumps on Sleeping Woman, Her Husband Responds

in Authors, Current Events, Defensive Use of Firearms, Rapid Fire, S.H. Blannelberry, This Week
Kenda Casey, 32, of Gulfport, Miss.  (Photo: SunHerald)

Kenda Casey, 32, of Gulfport, Miss. (Photo: SunHerald)

What would you do if a naked home invader jumped on your sleeping wife or girlfriend?

Think about that for a moment.

Well, one Gulfport, Miss., homeowner got to live out that situation recently when 32-year-old Kenda Casey broke into the man’s residence and placed his naked body on the homeowner’s sleeping wife.

According to Harrison county Lt. Coley Judy, the incident happened on Saturday, April 23, at around 6:30 a.m.

“Casey was naked when he entered the home and was on top of the woman when she woke up and found him,” Judy told the SunHerald. “She threw him to the ground and got on top of him and her husband pulled a gun on him and held him at gunpoint until deputies arrived.”

Authorities believe that Casey does not know the couple, who are in their 60s.  There was no sign of forced entry (maybe they left their doors unlocked?).

Casey is no stranger to law enforcement.  He has been arrested at least seven times since 2013 and for two of those arrests he was naked.

Back in June, he was arrested after stealing a vehicle and leading police on a chase.  The incident started when Casey attempted to walk into a Gulfport business in his birthday suit.

In 2014, he was arrested for indecent exposure.

It would appear that Casey is some kind of prowling pervert.  So, what would you do if Casey or someone liked him broke into your home and accosted your wife or girlfriend?

About the author: S.H. Blannelberry is the News Editor of GunsAmerica.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • ejharb August 28, 2018, 11:07 am

    If this befalls you opposing lawyers might be diligent enough to find anything you post on line so saying “I’ll blow him into next week!” Could return to haunt you. I like the answer “I’ll cross that bridge when I get to it”đŸ˜€

  • Beachhawk July 27, 2018, 3:05 pm

    If I was armed, I’d give him one order to surrender and then kill him if he failed to obey.

  • Timothy White May 8, 2016, 7:17 am

    I rightly cant say what id do in the instance I can tell my first instinct would be to protect my wife I’m a ccw carrier but have no interest to take a life but would if i had too I do know the urge to turn my dogs loose on him would be an option while i kept him at gun point

  • Larry May 7, 2016, 10:28 am

    And the guy looks like a clean cut man, not some hopped up fool or thug. Go figure!

  • Mongo May 6, 2016, 10:40 pm

    Why does he still have his teeth, and smiling in his mug shot? If they had killed him, they would most likely be in serious legal trouble, I admire their restraint, can’t say I wouldn’t have snuffed his light. But really? You couldn’t take 5 minutes and beat the living hell out of him? With the response of cops nowadays, there was plenty of time for a beatdown. No trip to the hospital before the jailhouse?!? He needed the ass whooping his parents held back. C’mon folks, to quote Eddie Murphy, “kick him in the ding-ding!!!”

  • raazorblade May 6, 2016, 9:02 pm

    Don’t worry about the millions spend on Aircraft Carriers or military. Worry about the millions spend on welfare freeloaders like this and the millions of mooslime terrorists that are being brought into this country..

  • Dusty May 6, 2016, 2:20 pm

    The US Supreme Court ruled over 30 years ago the indefinite lock-up of
    insane persons violated their civil rights. No real concern was directed towards the danger of so releasing some very dangerous individuals, nor was there any effective mechanism in place at the time to monitor or ‘treat’ them.
    FWIW- Governments at various levels actually sort of ‘needs’ persons like this at large- thus justifying their own existence, and the expenses (taxes…) needed to ‘care’ for them.
    Historically, we domesticated dogs and cats by maintaining them in a type of infantile, dependent condition. Our governments have thoughtfully done the same for many of our citizens, and recoil in horror from citizens who reject such care and demonstrate a sense of responsibility. The Romans called it “Bread and Circuses”- keeping the citizens happy. They got overrun and their Empire fell into ruin…

  • Ben There May 6, 2016, 1:47 pm

    What would I do?? Is this a trick question or something? What do you THINK one would do?

  • bob May 6, 2016, 12:14 pm

    just keep letting him out of jail like most other repeat offenders until they finally kill or rape somebody. like Chicago’s revolving prison doors. same people committing the same crimes over and over.

    • sudon't May 6, 2016, 3:49 pm

      I’m glad they didn’t kill him. I’m not sure I would’ve shown the same restraint. It really sounds like this guy is mentally ill. I mean, no one in their right mind does that sort of thing, right? What’s a shame is that we, as a society, have enough money to jail him, but apparently not enough money to get him the mental health services he so obviously needs.

  • John May 6, 2016, 10:31 am

    He likes Bing naked, we’ll leave him naked in prison- than see what happens .

    • nate May 7, 2016, 5:19 pm

      I like Bing naked myself. And Google naked, Yahoo naked, YouTube naked….

  • Jeb May 6, 2016, 9:59 am

    Simple question, shoot and kill him right on the spot. Just think about this for a minute, if the first person would have done this, he wouldn’t have been around to attack the others.

    Oh yeah, less news for the media, less work for all the starving lawyers and attorneys. How stupid of me to have forgot about the lifestyle they expect to live…

  • Cary May 6, 2016, 8:36 am

    Make him breakfast, SPAM & Eggs.

  • RetNavet May 6, 2016, 8:26 am

    Oh, I probably would have just took him out back of the house and turned the rottweiler (trained to bite the crotch first) loose on him.

  • BRASS May 6, 2016, 7:33 am

    Bang! Bang! and Bang!

    • smitch May 6, 2016, 8:31 am

      Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang, change magazine!

      • Peter May 6, 2016, 10:15 am

        Must live in one of those free states to have 15 rounds in the mag đŸ™‚

  • Rich May 6, 2016, 5:35 am

    And……he still roams the streets.

  • OMCHamlin May 6, 2016, 4:07 am

    “Obviously the man is mentally ill.”… Yes, obviously there is a great deal of mental illness in this once great country these days. If he’d tried this at my house, he would have been sent to Jesus that very night. “Know ye not the hour”? Here let me tell you what time it is, BRO…

  • jim April 29, 2016, 8:09 pm

    “she climbed on top of him…” “no sign of forced entry” these jokes will write themselves….

  • Al April 29, 2016, 7:25 pm

    He shouldn’t have been able to get that far. A Jack Russell Terrier would’ve been enough to give an early warning for a break-in. It’s not enough to be armed if you have to wait until a stranger is on top of your wife.

    (Also, please go back to your old web design – this change is not an improvement for your readers. OK Paul, insult me.)

  • REM1875 April 29, 2016, 7:24 am

    Why is this ….ahhh…gentleman …still on the streets instead of locked up for some of his priors?

    • MagnumOpUS April 29, 2016, 8:08 am

      He’s a man/male.
      “Gentleman” is more of a title or adjective in its application.

      Above parallel applies to “lady”…

  • SuperG April 28, 2016, 11:00 am

    Obviously the man is mentally ill. We used to have institutions to treat them, but they were closed to save money. In other news, our new multi-billion dollar aircraft carrier continues to near completion.

    • REM1875 April 29, 2016, 7:27 am

      Defense of the nation is actually one the constitutionally mandated duties of the federal government, caging and treating crazy is not.

      • jimbo May 6, 2016, 8:55 am

        Where in the Constitution does it mandate building multi-billion dollar floating targets purported to be able to re-fight the last big war?

        • topol May 11, 2018, 8:17 am

          Article 1, Section 8.
          The power to establish and maintain a navy, which includes “multi-billion dollar floating targets purported to be able to re-fight the last big war.”

Send this to a friend