Is This Guy Really Going to Be the Next ATF Director?

in News

Estimated reading time: 0 minutes

In a recent Washington Gun Law episode, William Kirk tackled swirling rumors about Blake Masters being considered for the role of ATF Director under a potential Trump administration.

While the name might not ring bells for everyone, Kirk didn’t hold back in breaking down who Masters is and whether he’s the right pick for the job.

Who is Blake Masters?

He’s a successful businessman with an impressive professional background. However, his political career has been far less stellar.

He ran for U.S. Senate in Arizona against Mark Kelly, lost decisively, and followed that up with an unsuccessful congressional run in Arizona’s 8th District. Despite significant funding and high expectations, both campaigns floundered, and Masters walked away without a win.

SEE ALSO: Compact Size, Max Performance: Meet the Alien Remus

After those losses, Masters reportedly vied for leadership of the Presidential Personnel Office but was turned down. Now, rumors suggest he’s aiming for the top seat at the ATF.

Is Masters pro-Second Amendment? Kirk highlighted a Facebook post from Masters where he’s seen holding a semi-automatic pistol with a stabilizing brace (see below):

While Masters presents himself as pro-Second Amendment, concerns linger. Critics question whether his ambition for power outweighs his dedication to defending constitutional rights.

One anonymous Arizona gun owner, quoted in the Arizona Daily Independent, put it bluntly:
“It’s clear Masters wants power, and that’s why President Trump can’t give it to him—especially not over our firearms.”

Some suggest more experienced and trusted figures, like Pinal County Sheriff Mark Lamb, would be a better fit for the role.

Kirk made one point crystal clear: the ATF doesn’t just need a Trump loyalist—it needs someone fiercely loyal to the Second Amendment and the constitutional rights of all Americans.

While Masters has the business acumen and the connections, his shaky political track record raises legitimate concerns about his ability to lead such a critical agency effectively.

For now, it’s all speculation. But if these rumors materialize, gun owners across the country will be watching closely.

As always, Kirk reminded viewers to stay informed, stay involved, and stay vigilant in defending their rights. You can follow Washington Gun Law HERE.

*** Buy and Sell on GunsAmerica! All Local Sales are FREE! ***

https://gunsamerica.com/listings/search

About the author: Larry Z Welcome to “Inside GunsAmerica: Where Values Meet Excellence”, an exclusive deep dive into one of the leading online platforms dedicated to the promotion and protection of the Second Amendment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • Doug January 3, 2025, 11:28 am

    Abraham Lincoln lost five separate elections before winning the presidency so I’m not sure Mr. Masters political loses should be used as a barometer for deciding how well he’d serve in the position of ATF Director. I’d rather hear what his history & philosophies are with regard to gun ownership & gun rights while under oath at a Congressional hearing. President Trump would be more in the know on this guy’s views in these areas so perhaps we should support him & just see how it all plays out. I think we probably need an ATF but we certainly don’t need one infested with anti-gun minions who there at the behest of a gun hating president like we’ve had for the last four years. Things are about to change (on several fronts) for the better in DC & it’s going to be fun to watch.

  • TexasPatriot January 3, 2025, 7:32 am

    We don’t need a new director. We need to abolish the agency and send all of those shitty over zealous agents to the unemployment line.

    • Hondo January 3, 2025, 1:38 pm

      Agree, nothing to add.

    • DIYin STL January 3, 2025, 2:26 pm

      Do you honestly think we will be better off with the FBI enforcing the laws and less known faceless deep state anti-gun bureaucrats ginning up new regulations? Without changing the laws or having them nullified in court, we are far better off to have a director of the ATF who understands that being a public servant means serving the public, not enlisting in a tyrannical army bent on subjugating the populous.

      • Phil January 3, 2025, 7:00 pm

        What does the ATF really do besides cause harm to FFLs? Call or email the JPFO and get their opinion.

Send this to a friend