Big Vote on Gun Control Coming for Oregonians

Big Vote on Gun Control Coming for Oregonians
(Photo: NSSF)

By Larry Keane

One of the nation’s “defund the police” and surging violent crime epicenters could see big changes on Election Day.

Oregonians will soon cast their ballots and they are showing signs they may reject a severe gun control ballot initiative, as well as elect the first pro-Second Amendment governor in more than forty years.

The Backdrop

The visuals were common and often on national news. Portland, Ore., was a hotbed of violence, looting and riots in 2020 in the wake of the murder of George Floyd and the rise of defund the police movement. Broken windows and vandalism were commonplace. Riots and destruction culminated with an attack on the downtown federal courthouse. Rioters used Molotov cocktails to set fire to the building.

It’s no surprise soft-on-criminal policies meant residents were left fearing for their safety. It’s been seen all across the country. In Portland, numerous businesses decided it was far too unsafe to continue to keep their doors open and closed up shop.

The situation was so bad the co-president of the Portland Downtown Development Group sent a letter to Portland Democratic and antigun Mayor Ted Wheeler and City Council members, criticizing the city’s policies. “The exodus of companies… does have most everything to do with the lawlessness you are endorsing downtown,” the letter stated, adding “It’s like nothing I have seen in 42 years of doing business in downtown.”

Portland was the focal point, but those feelings resonated across the state. Now a new effort by gun control groups means law-abiding Oregonians could face even more restrictions on their ability to protect themselves and businesses with a firearm, not more freedoms.

Top of the Ticket

Oregon’s Democratic Gov. Kate Brown was proclaimed a gunsense candidate by Everytown for Gun Safety and endorsed by Oregon Moms Demand Action. She signed more gun control laws last year but is term-limited, opening the race. Voters are considering a different direction.

Oregon state Rep. Christine Drazan is the Republican candidate, the minority leader in the state house and her belief in the Second Amendment is quite the opposite from Gov. Brown’s. There’s also Independent candidate state Rep. Betsy Johnson. She’s bucked her Democratic colleagues to vote against universal background checks for private firearm transfers and “red flag” laws that didn’t include Due Process rights protections. Compared to Democratic challenger Oregon House Speaker Tina Kotek, the differences are stark.

SEE ALSO: California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s Rap Lyrics Hypocrisy

Rep. Drazan told voters, “Oregon already has among the most stringent gun control laws in the nation on the books. As Governor, I will veto any bill that Compromises Oregonians’ Second Amendment rights, including the right to defend themselves and their family.”

Rep. Drazan has a pro-Second Amendment record. She’s a gunowner and voted against a flawed mandatory firearm storage proposal in 2021 that also made it a crime for lawful conceal carry permit holders to possess their firearm in the state capitol or on certain sensitive locations. In 2019, Rep. Drazan also voted against a “red flag” bill that denied accused Oregonians of their Due Process rights.

At a recent gubernatorial debate, gun control was a topic as Bend, Ore., was the site of a tragic shooting incident. Minority Leader Drazan explained, “What happened in Bend was an absolute tragedy. Someone facing extreme mental health challenges was intent on hurting others and was effectively able to do so… but more gun laws will not prevent every single tragedy from happening.”

What does it mean for Rep. Drazan heading to Election Day? Voters have currently made her the frontrunner in the race, according to polling.

Gun Control Ballot Measure

Voters will also decide whether to approve a gun control ballot initiative, IP 17, titled Ballot Measure 114. If enacted, the measure would require law-abiding Oregonians to first receive a permit-to-purchase a firearm. Those requirements include paying additional fees, completing an expanded background check, classroom training and more and the permit would be valid for five years. The ballot initiative also would implement restrictions on magazine capacity to 10 rounds or fewer. NSSF is a member of the coalition to vote down this proposal.

As crime remains one of the top issues on voters’ minds heading to Nov. 8, generic Republican candidates hold a 14-point advantage over generic Democrats. Those sentiments seem to be present in Oregon as voters began to early vote and IP 17’s fate not a foregone conclusion.

As issues of crime and the ability of law-abiding voters to protect themselves from criminals remain prominent, Oregonians could be poised to #GUNVOTE® on Election Day so they don’t risk their rights.

Larry Keane is Senior Vice President of Government and Public Affairs and General Counsel for the National Shooting Sports Foundation, the firearms industry trade association.

**Buy and Sell on GunsAmerica! All Local Sales are FREE!***

  • Cal October 14, 2022, 2:41 pm

    Hopefully Oregon will have the sense to vote for the control. Stop the ridiculous BS arguments that registration is confiscation – It isn’t – nor will it open a doorway to confiscation, no matter what crazy media gods tell you it will. Grow up you whining little saps so worried the govt. is gonna take your security blanket (AR), guns are popular even With Moderate Democrats, they don’t want total control, but Registration and more stringent laws are needed – that should be obvious to even the densest gun primitive here.

    • Give Me Freedom October 16, 2022, 12:17 am

      Yes, gun registration does lead to confiscation. Just look at the State of New Jersey for an example. Forced registration means local authorities know who firearm owners are and where they live.

      One of the Oregon proposals is so draconian that it makes all 11 to 35 round magazines illegal in the State. No grandfathering in on any current owners. Ten round limitations for firearm magazines are terrible. If you are in a self defense scenario you could run out of ammo easily with multiple opponents. And criminals do not give a flip about gun magazine capacity limitations. They will take the 11 to 35 round magazines leaving good citizens at a disadvantage.

      More laws will do nothing. Criminals do not care about the robbery, murder and rape laws so what makes you think they care about firearm laws?

  • CatRacer October 14, 2022, 9:09 am

    I sure hope Oregon can figure this out.
    I’m an Oregon/SW Washington native. We fled the Portland area at the end of 2020 in search of a free state that more closely matched our conservative values.
    We want to go “home” but I refuse to raise my young daughter in a communist s**thole like Washington or Oregon.
    As unlikely as it is, we’re hoping Oregon is able to figure this out and change the course of their doomed ship.

  • Liberalism Sucks October 14, 2022, 8:45 am

    I wish people would wake up and realize that GEORGE FLOYD WAS NOT MURDERED!!! F-ing loser drugged himself to death on Fentanyl. If someone is screaming “I can’t breathe” – they can, since they’re obviously drawing enough breath to make a clearly audible statement. In other words, just another scumbag whose death was self-inflicted, but “Dem BAAAAAAD ol’ honkey cracker po-po’s” were convenient scapegoats.

  • survivor50 October 12, 2022, 8:47 pm

    HEY !!! … It’s CHAZISTAN !!! … Who cares ???

    ( Just paint them Purple, Bend them over a Barrel, and break out the CRISCO !!! I hear BANJOS !!! )

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Send this to a friend